Cross References
|
Article Titles
|
| |
Anderson, T. (1993). Defining and structuring art criticism for education. Studies in Art Education, 34(4), 199-208. |
| AE |
Anderson, T. (1998). Aesthics as critical inquiry. Art Education, 51(5), 49-55. |
|
|
Atkinson, D. (1998). The production of the pupil as a subject within the art curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 30(1), 27-42.
|
| |
Barrett, T. (1986). A theoretical construct for interpreting photographs, Studies in Art Education, 27(2), p.52-60. |
| |
Barrett, T. (1994). Criticizing art: Understanding the contemporary. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield Publishing Company.
|
| |
Barrett, T. (1997). Talking about student art. Worchester, MA: Davis. |
| |
Barrett, T. (2002). Interpreting art: Reflecting, wondering, and responding. Boston, MA: McGraw - Hill.
|
| |
Barrett, T. (2003). Integrating visual culture. Art Education, 56(2), 7-12. |
| CU |
Burgess, L. & Addison, N. (2007). Conditions for learning: Partnerships for engaging secondary pupils with contemporary art, International Journal of Art & Design Education, 26(2), 185-198. |
|
|
Chung, S.K. (2005). Media/visual literacy art education: Cigarette ad deconstruction. Art Education, 58(3), 14-18. |
| |
Cromer, J. (1990). History, theory and practice of art criticism in art education. Reston, VA: National Art Education Association.
|
| |
Feldman, E. (1992). Formalism and its discontents. Studies in Art Education, 33(2), 122-126.
|
|
|
Feldman, E.B. (1994). Practical art criticism. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
|
| |
Fineberg, J. (1997). The innocent eye: Children's art and the modern artist. Princeton. NJ: Princeton University Press. |
| |
Hafeli, M. (2002). Content sources and influences in adolescent art works: A collective case study. Unpublished manuscript. |
| |
Hurwitz, A., Madeja, S.S., & Katter, E. (Eds.). (2003). Pathways to art appreciation, a source book for media & methods. Reston, VA: National Art Education Association.
|
|
|
Lampert, N. (2006). Enhancing critical thinking with aesthetic, critical, and creative inquiry. Art Education, 59(5), 46-50. |
| |
Marschalek, D. G. (2005). Object design: Twelve components to know, understand and apply. Art Education, 58(2), 46-53.
|
|
|
McKay, S.W., & Monteverde, S.R. (2003). Dialogic looking: Beyond the mediated experience. Art Education, 56(1), 40. |
| |
Ott, R.W. (1989). Teaching criticism in museums.In N. Berry & S. Mayer (Eds.). Museum education: History, theory and practice (pp. 172-193). Reston, VA: National Art Education Association.
|
| Ae |
Parsons, M. J. (1987b). Talk about a painting: A cognitive developmental analysis. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 21(1), 37-55. |
|
|
Sawyer, R.K. (2004). Creative teaching: Collaborative discussion as disciplined improvisation. Educational Researcher, 33(2), 12-20.
|
| |
Stout, C.J. (1999). Artists as writers: Enriching perspectives in art appreciation. Studies in Art Education, 40(3), 226-241. |
| |
Villeneuve, P., & Erickson, M. (2006). A taxonomy of understanding: Reflective art response and issues arising from the teaching of religious art. Journal of Cultural Research in Art Education, 24, 1-14. |
| |
Visser, M. (1994). The language of things. In G. A. Hickey (Ed.), Making and metaphor: A discussion of meaning in contemporary craft (pp. 12-19). Quebec: Canadian Museum of Civilization, Quebec with The Institute for Contemporary Canadian Craft. |
| |
Yenawine, P. (1998). Visual art and student-centered discussions. Theory into Practice, 37(4), 314-21. |
Critiques