Cross References
|
Article Titles
|
| |
Ament, E.A. (1998). Using feminist perspectives in art education. Art Education, 51(5), 56-61. |
| VC |
Bordo, S. (2003). Never just pictures. In J. Amelia (Ed.), The feminism and visual culture reader (pp. 454-465). New York: Routledge. |
|
|
Collins, G., & Sandell, R. (1984). Women, art and education. Reston, VA: National Art Education Association.
|
| |
Collins, G., & Sandell, R. (Eds.). (1996). Gender issues in art education: Content, contexts, and strategies. Reston, VA: National Art Education Association.
|
|
|
Congdon, K.G. (1991). Feminist approaches to art criticism. In D. Blandy and K.G. Congdon (Eds.). Pluralistic Approaches to Art Criticism (pp.15-23). Bowling Green, OH: Popular Press.
|
|
|
Ellsworth, E. (1992). Why doesn't this feel empowering? Working through the repressive myths of critical pedagogy. In C. Luke & J. Gore (Eds.). Feminisms and critical pedagogy. New York: Routledge, 90-119.
|
| |
Ford, D.Y., & Harris, J.J. (1999). Multicultural Gifted Education. New York: Teachers College Press.
|
| |
Garber, E. (1992). Feminism, aesthetics, and art education. Studies in Art Education, 33(4), 210-225. |
| |
Garber, E. (1996). Art criticism from a feminist point of view: An approach for teachers. In G. Collins & R. Sandell (Eds.), Gender issues in art education: Content, contexts, and strategies. Reston, VA: National Art Education Association, 20-29.
|
| |
Garber, E. (2003). Teaching about gender issues in the art education classroom: Myra Sadker Day. Studies in Art Education, 45(1), 56-72. |
| |
Gilligan, C. (1993). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women's development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
|
| |
|
| |
Grauer, K., Irwin, R.L., & Zimmerman, E. (Eds.). (2003). Women art educators v: conversations across time. Reston, VA: National Art Education Association.
|
| |
Guerrilla Girls (1998). The Guerrilla girls� bedside companion to the history of western art. New York: Penguin Books.
|
| TA |
Lather, P. (1991). Getting smart: Feminist research and pedagogy with/in the postmodern. New York: Routledge.
|
| |
Lather, P. (1992). Post-critical pedagogies: A feminist reading. In C. Luke & J. Gore (Eds.). Feminisms and critical pedagogy. New York: Routledge, 120-137.
|
| |
Lippard, L.R. (1995). The pink glass swan: Selected feminist essays on art. New York: The New Press.
|
| |
Madriz, E. (2000). Focus groups in feminist research. In N. K. Denzin & Y.S. Lincoln, (Eds.). Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc. (pp. 835-850).
|
| |
Meskimmon, M. (2003). Women making art: History, subjectivity, aesthetics. New York: Routledge. |
| |
Nochlin, L. (2006). Why have there been no great women artists?. In A. Jones (Ed.), The feminism and visual culture reader (pp. 229-233). New York: Routledge. (Reprinted from Women, art and power and other essays (1988). |
| |
Sacca, E. J. (1996). Women's full participation in art teaching and research: A proposal. In. G. Collins & R. Sandell (Eds.), Gender issues in art education: Content, contexts, and strategies. Reston, VA: National Art Education Association, 52-59.
|
| |
Sacca, E.J. & Zimmerman, E. (Eds.). (1998). Women art educators IV: Herstories, ourstories, future stories. Boucherville, Quebec: Canadian Society for Education Through Art, 70-75.
|
|
|
Shapiro, M. (2001). The education of women as artists: Project Womanhouse (1972). In H. Robinson (Ed.0, Feminism-art-theory: An anthology 1968-2000 (pp. 125-126). Malden, MA: Blackwell. (Reprinted from Schapiro, M. (1972). Art Journal, 31(3), 268-270.) |
| |
Smith-Shank, D.L. (1998b). Sugar and Spice and Everything: Reflections on a feminist aesthetic. The Journal of Social Theory in Art Education, (18), 21-28.
|
| |
Wilson, B., & Wilson, M. (1976). Visual narrative and the artistically gifted. The Gifted Child Quarterly, xx(4), 432-447.
|