Cross References
|
Article Titles
|
|
|
Anderson, R. (1997). A case study of the artist as teacher through the video work of Martha Davis. Studies in Art Education, 39(1), 37-56.
|
|
Applebee, A. N., Adler, M., & Flihan, S. (2007). Interdisciplinary curricula in middle and high school classrooms: Case studies of approaches to curriculum and instruction. American Educational Research Association. 44(4), 1002-1039.
|
|
Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S.K. (1998). Qualitative research in education: An introduction to theory and methods. (3rd ed.) Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
|
|
Carroll, K. (1997). Researching paradigms in art education. In S. La Pierre & E. Zimmerman (Eds.). Research methods and methodologies for art education (pp. 171-193). Reston, VA: National Art Education Association.
|
|
|
Chalmers, F.G. (1981). Art education as ethnology. Studies in Art Education, 22(3), 6-14.
|
|
Charmaz, K. (2000). Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods. In N. K. Denzin & Y.S. Lincoln, (Eds.). Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 509-436). (2nd ed.) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
|
|
Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. (1990). Research on teaching and teacher research: The issues that divide. Educational Researcher, 19(2), 2-11.
|
|
Denzin, N.K., & Lincoln, Y.S. (Eds.). (2000). Handbook of qualitative research, (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
|
|
Erickson, F. (1986). Qualitative methods in research in teaching. In M. Whittrock (Ed.) Handbook on teaching (pp.119-161) Washington: AERA.
|
|
Fontana, A. & Frey, J.H. (2000). The interview: From structured questions to negotiated text. In K. Denzin & Y.S. Lincoln, (Eds.). Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc. (pp. 645-672).
|
|
|
Galbraith, L. & Grauer, K. (2004). State of the field: Demographics and art teacher education. In E.W. Eisner & M.D. Day (Eds.) Handbook of research and policy in art education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum and Assoc. (pp 415-438).
|
|
|
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y.S. (Eds.). Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
|
|
|
Kemmis, S. & McTaggart, R. (2000). Participatory action research. . N. K. Denzin & Y.S. Lincoln, (Eds.). i>Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc. (pp. 567-606).
|
|
Koroscik, J. S., & Kowalchuk, E. (1997). Reading and interpreting research journal articles. In S. La Pierre & E. Zimmerman (Eds.), Research methods and methodologies for art education (pp. 75-137). Reston, VA: National Art Education Association.
|
|
La Pierre, S., & Zimmerman, E. (1997). Research methods and methodologies for art education. Reston, VA: National Art Education Association.
|
|
|
Langshear, C., & Knobel, M. (1997). The moral consequence of what we construct through qualitative research. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Australian Association for Research in Education. Brisbane, Australia.
|
|
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Book.
|
|
Maitland-Gholson, J., & Ettinger, L. (1994). Interpretive decision making in research. Studies in Art Education, 36(1), 18-27.
|
| |
Merriam, S.B. (2002). Qualitative research in practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. |
|
Miles, M.B., & Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
|
|
Pinar, W. F. (2002). Understanding curriculum. NY: Peter Lang.
|
|
Prawat, R. S. (1991). The value of ideas: The immersion approach to the development of thinking. Educational Researcher, 20(2), 3-10.
|
|
Schwandt, T.A. (2000). Three epistemological stances for qualitative inquiry: Interpretivism, hermeneutics, and social constructivism. In N. K. Denzin & Y.S. Lincoln, (Eds.). Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc. (pp.189-214).
|
|
Stake, R. E. (2000). Case studies. N. K. Denzin & Y.S. Lincoln, (Eds.). Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc. (pp. 435-454).
|
|
Stokrocki, M. (1997). Qualitative forms of research methods. In S. La Pierre & E. Zimmerman (Eds.), Research methods and methodologies for art education (pp. 33-57). Reston, VA: National Art Education Association.
|
|
Strauss, A. & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory(2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
|
|
Tedlock, B. (2000). Ethnography and ethnographic representation. N. K. Denzin & Y.S. Lincoln, (Eds.). Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc. (pp. 455-486).
|
|
Thurber, F. (2004). Teacher education as a field of study in art education: A comprehensive overview of methodology and methods used in research about art teacher education. In E. Eisner & M. Day (Eds.), The handbook of research and policy in art education (pp. 795-815). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
|
|
Wilson, B. (1997). The second search: Metaphor, Dimensions of meaning, and research topics in art education. In S. D. LaPierre & E. Zimmerman, (Eds.) Research methods and methodologies for art education. Reston, VA: National Art Education Association. pp. 1-32.
|